Section 145 of the CGST Act, 2017

Admissibility of micro films, facsimile copies of documents and computer printouts as documents and as evidence. A practical guide to electronic records, computer-generated reports and documentary evidence in GST proceedings.

CGST Act Section 145Electronic EvidenceComputer RecordsDigital DocumentsGST Proceedings

Section 145 at a Glance

Main purposeRecognises specified reproductions and electronically stored information as documents and evidence for GST purposes.
Modern relevanceImportant for ERP reports, electronic files, computer printouts and information stored on electronic devices or media.
Original documentFor the statutory situations covered by Section 145, the provision permits evidentiary use without further proof or production of the original, subject to its conditions.
In simple language: GST proceedings do not require every piece of evidence to exist only as a physical original. Section 145 gives specified digital and reproduced records the status of documents and makes them admissible as evidence, subject to the statutory requirements.

Contents

1. Statutory Text of Section 145

145. Admissibility of micro films, facsimile copies of documents and computer printouts as documents and as evidence.—

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force,—

(a) a micro film of a document or the reproduction of the image or images embodied in such micro film (whether enlarged or not); or

(b) a facsimile copy of a document; or

(c) a statement contained in a document and included in a printed material produced by a computer, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed; or

(d) any information stored electronically in any device or media, including any hard copies made of such information,

shall be deemed to be a document for the purposes of this Act and the rules made thereunder and shall be admissible in any proceedings thereunder, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence of any contents of the original or of any fact stated therein of which direct evidence would be admissible.

(2) In any proceedings under this Act or the rules made thereunder, where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate,—

(a) identifying the document containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that document as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the document was produced by a computer,

shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate and for the purposes of this sub-section it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.
Current-law position: Section 145 is currently in force and is headed “Admissibility of micro films, facsimile copies of documents and computer printouts as documents and as evidence.” The current consolidated text is reflected in the official/India Code materials.

2. Section 145 Explained in Simple Language

GST compliance is now heavily digital. Businesses maintain accounting records in ERP systems, generate invoices electronically, receive emails, download portal reports, store spreadsheets and retain electronic documents on computers, servers and other devices.

Section 145 recognises several such forms of information as “documents” for the purposes of the CGST Act and rules. It also provides for their admissibility in GST proceedings without requiring production of the original in the situations covered by the section.

The practical idea: if a business can properly identify and preserve an electronic record, the fact that the record is digital rather than a traditional paper original does not by itself make it unusable as GST evidence.

Why is this important?

3. Four Types of Records Covered by Section 145(1)

ClauseRecord typeSimple example
(a)Microfilm or reproduction of images in a microfilmArchived document image reproduced from microfilm.
(b)Facsimile copy of a documentA faxed reproduction of a signed document.
(c)Statement in a document included in computer-produced printed material, subject to prescribed conditionsComputer-generated accounting or transaction report printed from a system.
(d)Information stored electronically in a device or media, including hard copies made from that informationERP data, electronic files or information stored on a computer/device.
Important: Clause (c) expressly refers to prescribed conditions. A business should therefore not assume that every printout is automatically sufficient without considering the applicable procedural requirements.

4. Microfilms and Reproductions

Microfilm is an older document-storage technology, but Section 145 expressly recognises a microfilm of a document or reproduction of the images embodied in it, whether enlarged or not.

The provision is technologically broader than a simple paper-original approach: a properly covered reproduction can be treated as a document for GST purposes.

Example:

A company has archived historical accounting documents on microfilm. A relevant document is later required in a GST proceeding. The statutory provision can recognise the microfilm or its image reproduction as a document.

For practical modern businesses, this clause is less frequently encountered than electronic records, but it remains part of the statutory framework.

5. Facsimile Copies

A facsimile copy is expressly included in Section 145(1)(b). A fax reproduction therefore does not become irrelevant merely because it is a reproduction rather than the original paper document.

Example – old contract:

A vendor had sent a signed agreement by fax years earlier. The original is no longer readily available, but the fax copy remains in the company's records. Section 145 provides the statutory basis for treating the specified facsimile copy as a document for GST purposes.

Good practice: retain the fax copy together with surrounding correspondence, contract references and accounting records so that its commercial context can be explained.

6. Computer Printouts

Section 145(1)(c) addresses a statement contained in a document and included in printed material produced by a computer, subject to prescribed conditions.

This is important for accounting and tax teams because many GST workings are produced from ERP systems, accounting software and spreadsheets.

Computer outputExamplesWhat to preserve
Ledger reportSupplier ledger, customer ledger, tax ledgerSource ledger, report period, filters and system source.
Invoice reportSales/purchase invoice listingSource transactions and report-generation parameters.
GST reconciliationPurchase register vs GSTR-2B reportOriginal files, mapping logic and final report.
Tax computationGST liability or ITC workingUnderlying transaction data and formulas.

7. Electronically Stored Information

Section 145(1)(d) covers any information stored electronically in any device or media, including hard copies made of that information.

This is particularly relevant to present-day GST records. Electronic information can exist on computers, servers, storage media and other electronic devices or media.

Examples of potentially relevant electronic information

Digital does not mean unquestionable. Section 145 provides admissibility for covered records; it does not mean that every factual assertion, calculation or interpretation contained in an electronic file is automatically correct.

8. Certificate Under Section 145(2)

Section 145(2) is important when a statement is sought to be given in evidence by virtue of Section 145. The certificate is intended to identify the document and explain how it was produced, including relevant particulars of the device involved in production.

The certificate identifies

  1. The document: what document contains the statement.
  2. Production method: how the document was produced.
  3. Device particulars: relevant information about the device involved in production, sufficient to show that the document was produced by a computer.
  4. Knowledge and belief: the statute provides that, for this subsection, it is sufficient for the matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person making the statement.
Practical takeaway: When a GST dispute involves a computer-generated record, the finance/tax team should be able to explain the source system, extraction process, report identity and relevant device/system details rather than simply producing an unexplained printout.

9. Is the Original Always Required?

Section 145 expressly provides that the specified records shall be admissible in proceedings under the Act and rules, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence of the contents or facts for which direct evidence would be admissible.

This is an important statutory facilitation for electronic and reproduced records. However, businesses should not interpret it as a licence to destroy originals or source data.

Best practice: even where Section 145 permits an electronic copy or computer-generated record to be used, retaining the source data and audit trail is strongly advisable. It can help establish completeness, context, accuracy and the method by which the record was generated.

10. Detailed Practical Examples

Example 1 – ERP ledger

A GST officer requests a supplier ledger. The company generates the ledger from its ERP for the relevant period. Section 145 is relevant to the statutory treatment of the computer-produced record.

Example 2 – Sales register

A company prints its monthly sales register from accounting software. The report is accompanied by the underlying system data and report parameters.

Example 3 – Purchase reconciliation

A finance team produces a purchase register and reconciliation report generated from an internal system. Preserve the purchase data, source GSTR-2B files and reconciliation logic.

Example 4 – Electronic invoice

An invoice exists primarily in electronic form. The business maintains the electronic file and associated accounting entry instead of relying only on a printed copy.

Example 5 – Email record

An email exchange explains why an invoice was cancelled and reissued. The original email chain and attachment are preserved to maintain context.

Example 6 – Computer printout disputed

A taxpayer disputes a report produced by an external system. The appropriate response is to examine the source, extraction method, filters, system records and supporting transaction documents.

Example 7 – Hard copy of electronic data

A report is printed from electronically stored information. Section 145(1)(d) expressly includes hard copies made of electronically stored information.

Example 8 – Historical microfilm

A legacy business record is available as a microfilm reproduction. The statutory provision expressly recognises microfilm and image reproductions.

Example 9 – Facsimile agreement

A signed document was transmitted by fax. The retained facsimile copy can fall within Section 145(1)(b).

Example 10 – ERP migration

A company migrated from one accounting system to another. During a later GST proceeding, it should preserve migration reports and legacy exports so that historical data can be explained.

Example 11 – Spreadsheet working

A GST calculation is prepared in Excel using imported ERP data. The company should retain the source export, workbook version and relevant formulas or transformation steps.

Example 12 – Cloud-hosted system

A business uses a hosted accounting platform. It should maintain reliable exports and documentation explaining the source system and report-generation process.

11. ERP, Excel and GST Data: How Finance Teams Should Prepare

For a finance department, Section 145 has practical significance whenever a tax position depends on a report generated by software.

RecordRecommended evidence pack
Purchase registerERP export + source invoices + vendor master + period/filter details.
Sales registerERP export + invoice series + credit/debit notes + GST return reconciliation.
GSTR-2B reconciliationOriginal portal file + purchase register + matching logic + exception report.
GSTR-1 workingSales data + amendment records + return filing acknowledgement.
GSTR-3B workingTax liability/ITC workings + ledgers + return acknowledgement + payment details.
Trial balanceERP export + period lock information + ledger mapping + financial statements.

Recommended document naming

Use consistent names such as GSTIN_FY_Period_ReportType_ExtractionDate_Version. This makes later identification much easier when thousands of files are involved.

12. Evidence-Readiness Controls for a Company

  1. Maintain read-only archives of important GST reports after filing.
  2. Preserve the original source export before editing an Excel working file.
  3. Record report filters such as date range, GSTIN, branch and ledger selection.
  4. Use version control for reconciliation and tax workings.
  5. Restrict unauthorised editing of source accounting data.
  6. Maintain backups and test restoration periodically.
  7. Keep portal downloads with the period and GSTIN clearly identified.
  8. Retain return acknowledgements and payment challans with the underlying workings.
  9. When a dispute arises, preserve relevant records instead of overwriting them.
  10. Document major ERP migrations and data conversions.
Audit-ready principle: someone who did not prepare the report should be able to understand what system produced it, for what period, using what data and what filters.

13. Section 144 vs Section 145

PointSection 144Section 145
Main subjectPresumption as to specified documents in certain cases.Admissibility of specified reproduced and electronic records.
Core issueWhat the court may presume about certain documents.Whether specified reproductions/electronic information can be treated as documents and admitted as evidence.
Digital recordsNot its central subject.Expressly covers information stored electronically in any device or media.
OriginalDeals with presumptions concerning specified documents.Expressly permits covered records to be admitted without further proof or production of the original, subject to the section.
CertificateNo comparable certificate mechanism in Section 144.Section 145(2) provides a certificate mechanism for statements sought to be given in evidence by virtue of the section.

These sections work differently and should not be treated as interchangeable.

14. Common Mistakes

“A PDF is automatically correct because Section 145 covers electronic information.”

No. Admissibility and factual correctness are different questions. Preserve the source and supporting evidence.

“The original can always be destroyed.”

Section 145 may remove the need for production of the original in the covered evidentiary situation, but retaining originals/source data remains prudent.

“Every Excel file is automatically reliable.”

An Excel file may be edited, filtered or transformed. Keep the source export and document the processing.

“A computer printout needs no explanation.”

Section 145(2) specifically addresses certification where a statement is sought to be given in evidence by virtue of the section.

“Electronic records are only relevant to criminal cases.”

No. Section 145 applies to proceedings under the CGST Act and rules.

“Printing an ERP report changes its evidentiary status.”

The statutory framework expressly contemplates computer-produced printed material and hard copies of electronically stored information.

15. Questions People Commonly Search

16. Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is Section 145 of the CGST Act?

It provides for admissibility of specified microfilms, facsimile copies, computer-produced material and electronically stored information as documents and evidence in proceedings under the Act and rules.

2. Does Section 145 recognise electronic records?

Yes. Section 145(1)(d) expressly covers information stored electronically in any device or media, including hard copies made from that information.

3. Can a computer printout be used as evidence?

Yes, Section 145(1)(c) specifically addresses statements included in printed material produced by a computer, subject to prescribed conditions.

4. Does Section 145 apply to Excel reports?

An Excel report can fall within the broader electronic/computer-generated record framework depending on how it was produced and the applicable conditions. Preserve the source data and report-generation details.

5. Is the original document always required?

No. For records covered by Section 145, the provision states that they are admissible without further proof or production of the original, subject to the statutory framework.

6. What is Section 145(2)?

It provides a certificate mechanism identifying the document, describing how it was produced and giving appropriate particulars of the device involved in producing it.

7. Does Section 145 make every electronic file automatically genuine?

No. Admissibility is different from proving every factual assertion or calculation contained in a record.

8. Does Section 145 cover emails?

Electronic information can fall within the broad wording of Section 145(1)(d), depending on the circumstances and applicable evidentiary requirements. Preserve the original email and relevant metadata/context where available.

9. Does Section 145 cover ERP data?

Electronic information stored in an accounting or ERP environment can fall within Section 145(1)(d). The business should preserve reliable source data and explain the extraction process.

10. Does Section 145 apply only to tax authorities?

No. It is an evidentiary provision for proceedings under the CGST Act and rules; its practical relevance depends on the particular proceeding and record.

11. What should a company retain with an electronic GST report?

Retain the source export, report period, filters, GSTIN, system/source details, version history and supporting accounting documents.

12. What is a facsimile copy?

It is a reproduction of a document transmitted or reproduced through facsimile technology. Section 145(1)(b) expressly includes a facsimile copy.

13. What is a microfilm reproduction?

Section 145(1)(a) covers a microfilm of a document or reproduction of images embodied in the microfilm, whether enlarged or not.

14. Does Section 145 create a tax demand?

No. It concerns documentary status and admissibility, not the substantive computation of GST liability.

15. Is Section 145 still relevant in 2026?

Yes. Current consolidated materials continue to list Section 145 as an in-force provision of the CGST Act.

17. Quick Revision – Section 145

  • Section 145 = admissibility of specified reproduced and electronic records.
  • Microfilms and reproductions are covered.
  • Facsimile copies are covered.
  • Computer-produced printed material is covered subject to prescribed conditions.
  • Electronically stored information in a device or media is covered.
  • Hard copies made from electronic information are expressly included.
  • Covered records can be admitted without further proof or production of the original, subject to the statutory framework.
  • Section 145(2) provides a certificate mechanism identifying the document and production method/device particulars.
  • Admissibility does not automatically establish factual correctness.
  • Finance teams should preserve source data, report parameters, versions and supporting records.

18. Legal Disclaimer

This page is provided for general educational and compliance-workflow purposes. The evidentiary treatment of electronic and reproduced records can depend on the exact proceeding, applicable rules and other laws. Verify the law applicable to the relevant period and obtain professional advice where appropriate. This page is not a substitute for professional legal advice.