GST ACT — SECTION 15

Value of Taxable Supply — Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017

A comprehensive practical guide to GST valuation: transaction value, inclusions, discounts, related and distinct persons, subsidies, reimbursements, pure-agent expenses, non-monetary consideration, Rule 27–35 valuation methods, corporate guarantees, import of services and the important 2026 amendment that is enacted but not yet operative.

Transaction valuePrimary valuation rule
5 major clausesSection 15(2) inclusions
Discount rulesSection 15(3) conditions
2026 amendmentEnacted, commencement yet to be notified

1. What Section 15 does

Section 15 answers a fundamental GST question: “On what monetary value should GST be calculated?”

Section 15 is the central valuation provision of the CGST Act. It starts with the normal commercial rule—use the transaction value where the supplier and recipient are not related and price is the sole consideration—and then provides rules for additions, discounts, non-monetary consideration, related-party transactions and prescribed valuation methods.

Do not confuse value with rate or time: Section 12/13 determine when GST liability arises, Section 14 addresses rate-change timing, while Section 15 determines the taxable value on which the applicable tax rate is applied.

The current CBIC text states that the transaction value is the price actually paid or payable where supplier and recipient are not related and the price is the sole consideration. It also separately identifies statutory inclusions and exclusions. citeturn0search0turn0search6

2. Complete statutory structure

ProvisionSubjectPractical role
15(1)Transaction valuePrimary valuation method where the statutory conditions are satisfied.
15(2)Mandatory inclusionsAdds specified taxes/charges, recipient-paid supplier liabilities, incidental expenses, delayed-payment additions and price-linked subsidies.
15(3)DiscountsIdentifies discounts that are excluded from value, both before/at supply and post-supply subject to statutory conditions.
15(4)Prescribed valuationApplies where value cannot be determined under 15(1); valuation follows prescribed rules.
15(5)Notified special valuationPermits Government, on Council recommendation, to prescribe valuation for notified supplies.
ExplanationRelated personsDefines when supplier and recipient are treated as related, including control, shareholding, employer-employee and family relationships.

Section 15 has been in force from 1 July 2017. The current official CBIC page also shows an important 2026 amendment marker: Finance Act 2026 section 153 substitutes the post-sale discount wording, but the amendment is yet to be notified into force. citeturn1search1

3. Transaction value — Section 15(1)

The normal rule has three cumulative conditions:

1. Actual price
Value is the price actually paid or payable for the supply.
2. Parties are not related
The supplier and recipient must not fall within the statutory related-person definition.
3. Price is the sole consideration
There must not be an additional non-monetary consideration that changes the valuation analysis.
If all three are satisfied
Transaction value is ordinarily the starting point for GST valuation.

Example

A contractor supplies taxable construction services to an unrelated customer for ₹1 crore, and ₹1 crore is the only consideration. Subject to Section 15(2) inclusions and Section 15(3) valid discounts, the transaction value is the starting point for valuation.

Professional point: “Invoice value” and “transaction value” are usually aligned in ordinary transactions, but they are not synonymous concepts. First establish whether Section 15(1) conditions are met; then test statutory additions and exclusions.

4. Price must be the sole consideration

If the recipient provides something else in addition to money—for example, another product, asset, service or other non-monetary consideration—the transaction may fall outside the straightforward Section 15(1) route.

In such a case, the valuation mechanism moves into the prescribed rules, particularly Rule 27 for consideration not wholly in money.

Example — exchange transaction

A new machine is sold for ₹20 lakh plus an old machine supplied by the customer. The value cannot be determined merely from the ₹20 lakh cash component if the old machine is part of the consideration. Rule 27 provides the valuation sequence for such cases. CBIC's valuation rules illustrate the same principle using a new phone supplied against an old phone. citeturn0search1

Do not understate value: The fact that the invoice shows only the cash amount does not automatically mean that the cash amount is the complete taxable value.

5. Section 15(2) — amounts that must be included

Even where transaction value under Section 15(1) is available, Section 15(2) requires specified amounts to be added to the value.

ClauseInclusionSimple meaning
15(2)(a)Taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges under laws other than GST laws specifically excluded by the sectionCertain non-GST statutory levies charged separately by the supplier form part of value.
15(2)(b)Supplier's liability incurred by recipientIf the supplier is liable for an amount relating to the supply but the recipient pays it and it is not already included, add it.
15(2)(c)Incidental expensesCommission, packing and charges for anything done in relation to supply at/before delivery or supply.
15(2)(d)Interest, late fee, penaltyAmounts for delayed payment of consideration are included.
15(2)(e)Price-linked subsidiesSubsidies directly linked to price are included, except Central/State Government subsidies.

The current CBIC text reproduces all five categories. citeturn0search0

6. Section 15(2)(a) — taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges

The value includes taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under laws other than the specified GST laws where they are charged separately by the supplier.

Practical logic

GST itself is not added to taxable value merely because it is shown on the invoice. Section 15(2)(a) is directed at other statutory levies falling within the clause.

Example: If a supplier is required to collect a non-GST statutory levy that falls within Section 15(2)(a) and charges it separately in connection with the supply, that amount can form part of taxable value.

For every statutory charge, identify its legal character first. Do not automatically add every amount described as “tax”, “fee” or “cess” without checking whether it falls within the wording of Section 15(2)(a).

7. Section 15(2)(b) — supplier's liability paid by recipient

This clause prevents a supplier from excluding an amount from taxable value merely because the recipient, rather than the supplier, physically pays it.

Example

Suppose a supplier is contractually liable to bear a particular statutory or supply-related expense, but the customer pays that expense directly on the supplier's behalf. If the amount is not already included in the price, Section 15(2)(b) can require it to be added to the taxable value.

Audit question: Ask “Who is legally liable for the expense?” rather than only “Who made the payment?”

8. Section 15(2)(c) — incidental expenses and charges

Section 15(2)(c) includes incidental expenses such as commission and packing and amounts charged for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply at or before delivery of goods or supply of services.

Packing
Supplier charges packing connected with the supply.
Commission
Supplier charges commission connected with the supply.
Pre-delivery activity
Supplier performs a chargeable activity relating to the supply before delivery.
Service-related charges
Amounts charged for activities forming part of the supply arrangement.

In construction contracts, this provision should be considered alongside the contract's treatment of mobilisation, design, testing, inspection, site establishment, freight and other charges. The legal result depends on the nature of the charge and whether it is connected with the supply.

9. Section 15(2)(d) — interest, late fee and penalty

Interest, late fee or penalty for delayed payment of consideration is included in value under Section 15(2)(d).

Example

A taxable service is supplied for ₹10 lakh and the customer later pays ₹50,000 as contractual interest for delayed payment. The ₹50,000 falls within the statutory valuation provision. The separate time-of-supply treatment for this additional amount must also be considered under Section 13(6) for services or Section 12(6) for goods.

Important connection: Section 15 answers how much value is included; Sections 12/13 determine when the tax on the additional amount arises.

10. Section 15(2)(e) — subsidies directly linked to price

Subsidies directly linked to the price of a supply are included in value, except subsidies provided by the Central Government and State Governments.

The section also explains that the amount of subsidy is included in the value of the supply of the supplier who receives the subsidy.

Do not treat every subsidy identically. The key questions are whether the subsidy is directly linked to the price and whether it is a Central/State Government subsidy falling within the statutory exclusion.

Practical review

  • Identify the subsidy provider.
  • Read the subsidy scheme and eligibility conditions.
  • Determine whether the amount directly affects the price of the supply.
  • Establish who receives the subsidy.
  • Document why it is included or excluded under Section 15(2)(e).

11. Section 15(3) — discounts that are excluded

Section 15(3) creates a specific statutory route for excluding discounts from taxable value.

A. Discount before or at the time of supply

A discount given before or at the time of supply is excluded where it is duly recorded in the invoice.

B. Discount after the supply

Under the currently operative Section 15(3)(b), a post-supply discount can be excluded if the statutory conditions are met, including issuance of a supplier credit note and reversal of attributable ITC by the recipient, together with the conditions concerning prior agreement and invoice linkage that remain operative until the 2026 amendment is brought into force.

Discount situationCurrent compliance focus
Before/at supplyRecord discount in invoice.
After supplySection 15(3)(b) conditions must be tested; Section 34 credit note and recipient ITC reversal are important.
Commercial/financial discount without GST reductionMay remain outside taxable-value reduction; analyse whether it is consideration for another service or merely a commercial adjustment.

CBIC Circular 92/11/2019-GST explains the treatment of post-supply/volume discounts and distinguishes discounts from additional consideration for promotional activities. citeturn1search40turn2search5

12. Post-sale discount and ITC reversal — detailed treatment

The most important operational issue in a post-sale discount is the relationship between the supplier's reduction in output tax and the recipient's corresponding ITC reversal.

Supplier
Issues the prescribed credit note and reduces taxable value only when statutory conditions are satisfied.
Recipient
Reverses the ITC attributable to the discount as required by Section 15(3)(b)(ii).
Documentation
Link discount to relevant supplies/invoices and retain supporting agreements and credit-note records under the current law.
Audit trail
Supplier and recipient records should reconcile the discount amount and ITC reversal.

Circular 212/06/2024-GST provided a mechanism for evidence of recipient ITC reversal, including CA/CMA certification or an undertaking in specified lower-value cases. However, the Government subsequently withdrew that circular through Circular 253/10/2025-GST dated 1 October 2025. Therefore, the old 212/2024 evidence procedure should not be presented as the current mandatory mechanism. citeturn1search36turn1search38

13. Finance Act 2026 — important current-law warning

Finance Act 2026, section 153, substitutes Section 15(3)(b). The amended wording removes the present requirements in clause (b)(i) concerning a discount being established by an agreement entered into at or before the time of supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices.

But this amendment is NOT yet operative. The official CBIC Tax Information Portal currently marks the Finance Act 2026 substitution as “w.e.f. yet to be notified”. Therefore, the enacted amendment must be distinguished from the law presently in force. citeturn1search1
PositionCurrent operative lawFinance Act 2026 amended text
Pre-supply agreement / invoice linkageStill part of current Section 15(3)(b)(i) conditions.Would be removed once the amendment is notified.
Credit noteRequired for qualifying post-sale discount.Continues.
Recipient ITC reversalRequired under 15(3)(b)(ii).Continues through the amended wording.
Effective dateCurrent law applies today.Not yet notified into force.
Research rule: For any transaction occurring before the Finance Act 2026 amendment is brought into force, do not apply the amended Section 15(3)(b) merely because Parliament has enacted it.

15. Distinct persons and Schedule I

GST treats different registrations of the same legal entity in different States/UTs as distinct persons under Section 25. Supplies between distinct persons in the course or furtherance of business can therefore have GST implications even when there is no conventional third-party sale.

Schedule I separately identifies certain activities between related/distinct persons as supplies even without consideration. This is particularly important when applying Section 15 to internal services, shared costs, cross-charges and head-office/branch arrangements.

Valuation sequence: First establish whether there is a supply. If yes, determine whether the supplier and recipient are distinct/related. Only then select the correct valuation rule.

The GST Council's corporate-guarantee material expressly links Schedule I, related persons and Section 15 valuation with Rule 28. citeturn2search4turn2search30

16. Consideration not wholly in money — Rule 27

Where consideration is not wholly in money, Rule 27 provides a valuation sequence:

  1. open market value;
  2. if unavailable, total monetary consideration plus the known money equivalent of non-monetary consideration;
  3. if still unavailable, value of goods/services of like kind and quality;
  4. if still unavailable, monetary consideration plus the amount determined under Rule 30 or Rule 31.

CBIC's valuation rules illustrate the principle with exchange of an old phone against a new phone and with barter of a printer against a laptop. citeturn0search1

Business examples

  • barter transactions;
  • trade-in / exchange offers;
  • advertising exchanged for goods or services;
  • service provided partly for shares or other assets;
  • settlement of consideration through non-cash arrangements.

17. Rules 27–35 — the valuation ladder

RuleSubjectPractical use
27Consideration not wholly in moneyBarter/exchange/non-cash consideration.
28Distinct/related persons and supplies through agentGroup-company, branch and related-party valuation.
29Goods through agentPrincipal-agent goods valuation.
30Cost-based method110% of relevant cost where preceding rules do not determine value.
31Residual methodReasonable means consistent with Section 15 and rules.
32Specified suppliesForeign currency/money changing, air travel agents, life insurance, second-hand goods, vouchers etc.
33Pure agentExcludes qualifying third-party expenditure from value.
34Exchange rateDetermines value of taxable supplies involving foreign currency.
35Special procedure for notified servicesPrescribed valuation for specified notified supplies.

CBIC's current valuation-rules page reproduces the valuation hierarchy, including Rules 27–35. citeturn0search1

18. Related/distinct person valuation — Rule 28

Rule 28 generally starts with open market value, then like kind and quality, followed by Rules 30/31. It contains an important proviso: where the recipient is eligible for full input tax credit, the value declared in the invoice is deemed to be the open market value in the ordinary Rule 28 framework.

Practical example: A head office provides taxable support services to its State GST registration. If the recipient is eligible for full ITC and the transaction falls within the Rule 28 proviso, the declared invoice value can have a special valuation consequence.

However, this general framework must not be mechanically applied to categories for which a special valuation provision exists—such as corporate guarantees under Rule 28(2).

19. Corporate guarantee valuation — Rule 28(2)

Corporate guarantees between related persons became a major GST valuation issue after Rule 28(2) was inserted by Notification No. 52/2023-Central Tax dated 26 October 2023.

The rule provides a specific deemed value for the supply of services by a supplier to a related recipient by way of providing a corporate guarantee to a banking company or financial institution: 1% of the amount of the guarantee offered, or the actual consideration, whichever is higher. citeturn2search30

Important distinction: Rule 28(2) deals with corporate guarantees. Circular 204/16/2023-GST separately clarified treatment of personal guarantees provided by directors and stated that Rule 28(2) does not apply to the director's personal guarantee. citeturn2search28turn2search1

Example

Company A gives a corporate guarantee of ₹100 crore for its related company to a bank. If Rule 28(2) applies and actual consideration is lower than ₹1 crore, the deemed value is ₹1 crore. The exact applicability, guarantee amount, amendments and transaction facts must be documented.

20. Pure-agent expenses — Rule 33

Not every amount recovered from a customer automatically becomes taxable value. Rule 33 allows qualifying expenditure incurred by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient to be excluded if all prescribed conditions are met.

ConditionMeaning
Third-party contractThe contract for the third-party service is between the third party and recipient.
Recipient uses the serviceThe recipient uses the procured service for its own purpose.
Recipient is liable to payThe underlying third-party payment is the recipient's liability.
AuthorisationRecipient authorises supplier to make payment.
No own useSupplier does not use the goods/services for its own interest.
Actual recoverySupplier recovers only the actual amount incurred.

CBIC's Rule 33 illustration uses company-incorporation-related statutory fees paid by a service provider as a classic pure-agent example. citeturn0search1

Common error: Calling an amount a “reimbursement” is not enough. The contractual and factual conditions of Rule 33 must be satisfied.

21. Special valuation rules — Rule 32 and other cases

Rule 32 contains special valuation methods for specified supplies. Examples include:

  • foreign currency / money changing;
  • air travel-agent services;
  • life insurance;
  • second-hand goods where specified conditions are satisfied;
  • tokens, vouchers, coupons and stamps redeemable against supplies;
  • certain notified services between distinct persons where the rule prescribes a NIL value.

The existence of these rules demonstrates that Section 15(4) is not a single alternative formula. It is the gateway to a structured set of prescribed valuation methods. citeturn0search1

22. Import of services from related persons — full ITC clarification

Section 15 becomes particularly important for cross-border related-party services because Schedule I can deem certain related-party imports to be supplies even without consideration.

Circular 210/04/2024-GST addressed valuation of import of services by a related person where the Indian recipient is eligible for full input tax credit. The circular was issued because field-level demands had arisen from expansive interpretations of related-party service arrangements. citeturn2search27

Practical lesson: For related-party imports, do not jump directly to a valuation demand. First establish whether there is an import of service/supply under the statutory provisions, then apply the relevant valuation rules and the specific clarification applicable to the recipient's ITC position.

23. Construction and infrastructure — Section 15 in practice

Construction and infrastructure businesses have complex valuation because contracts can contain multiple charges and commercial adjustments.

ItemSection 15 question
Contract priceIs this the transaction value under 15(1)?
Mobilisation advanceConsider time of supply separately; valuation follows the consideration attributable to the supply.
Material supplied by clientCould affect consideration/valuation; examine contract and non-monetary consideration.
Freight / packing / incidental chargesTest Section 15(2)(c).
Client-paid supplier liabilityTest Section 15(2)(b).
Retention amountDetermine whether it is merely deferred payment or a genuine reduction/discount; valuation and time-of-supply are separate questions.
Performance-linked discountTest Section 15(3) and whether any separate service/consideration exists.
Late-payment interestSection 15(2)(d) inclusion; also test Section 13(6).
Important: Retention money is not automatically a discount. The contract, enforceability, payment obligation and actual commercial arrangement must be examined separately from the GST valuation rule.

24. Detailed practical examples

Example 1 — ordinary sale

Supplier sells machinery to an unrelated customer for ₹50 lakh, with no non-monetary consideration. Subject to statutory additions and valid discounts, ₹50 lakh is the starting transaction value.

Example 2 — packing charge

Supplier charges ₹50 lakh for goods plus ₹2 lakh packing charged in connection with the supply. Section 15(2)(c) requires the incidental packing charge to be included where it falls within the clause.

Example 3 — customer pays supplier's liability

A supplier is contractually liable for an expense of ₹1 lakh, but the recipient pays the third party directly. If the expense falls within Section 15(2)(b) and is not already included, it can form part of taxable value.

Example 4 — post-sale volume discount

A manufacturer grants a ₹10 lakh post-sale discount through a GST credit note. The supplier must test the operative Section 15(3)(b) conditions, including the recipient's attributable ITC reversal and the current agreement/invoice-linkage requirements until the Finance Act 2026 amendment becomes operative.

Example 5 — commercial discount with promotional activity

A manufacturer gives an additional ₹5 lakh to a dealer only if the dealer conducts a promotional campaign. The commercial description “discount” does not end the analysis. The arrangement may represent consideration for a separate service by the dealer, as explained in GST Council material. citeturn2search5

Example 6 — pure agent

A consultant pays a statutory registration fee of ₹20,000 on behalf of the client under the required pure-agent conditions and recovers exactly ₹20,000. If all Rule 33 conditions are satisfied, the amount can be excluded from value.

Example 7 — related-party service

Head office supplies services to a related group entity. The invoice amount cannot automatically be accepted as ordinary transaction value; Rule 28 must be considered.

Example 8 — corporate guarantee

A holding company provides a ₹50 crore corporate guarantee to a bank for its subsidiary. If Rule 28(2) applies, the special deemed valuation mechanism must be tested rather than relying only on the absence of guarantee commission.

25. Legislative & GST Council timeline

1 July 2017: Section 15 came into force with the principal GST valuation framework. citeturn0search6
2018–2019: GST Council discussions and Circular 92/11/2019-GST developed practical guidance on post-sale and secondary discounts, including distinguishing discounts from consideration for promotional services. citeturn1search40turn2search5
2019: The 36th GST Council material discussed secondary/post-sale discounts and the treatment of commercial credit notes where Section 15(3) conditions for reducing taxable value were not met. citeturn2search5
26 October 2023: Notification No. 52/2023-CT inserted Rule 28(2) for valuation of corporate guarantee services between related persons; Circular 204/16/2023-GST followed on 27 October 2023. citeturn2search28turn2search1
26 June 2024: Circular 210/04/2024-GST clarified valuation of related-party imported services where the Indian recipient is eligible for full ITC. Circular 212/06/2024-GST provided an evidence mechanism for post-sale discount ITC reversal. citeturn2search27turn1search36
1 October 2025: Circular 253/10/2025-GST withdrew Circular 212/06/2024-GST, so the earlier CA/CMA/undertaking procedure should not be presented as the current mandatory mechanism. citeturn1search38
3 September 2025: GST Council recommended changes to Section 15(3)(b) to remove the pre-supply agreement/invoice-linkage requirement for post-sale discounts and align Section 34 accordingly. citeturn0search32turn1search37
30 March 2026: Finance Act 2026 enacted section 153 substituting Section 15(3)(b), but the official CBIC consolidated text states that the substitution is yet to be notified. citeturn1search1
Current September 2026 position: The existing Section 15(3)(b) conditions remain operative until the Finance Act 2026 amendment is brought into force. The amendment should be shown as enacted-but-pending, not as current law.

26. Important circulars and official guidance

ReferenceSubject / practical relevance
Circular 92/11/2019-GST — 7 March 2019Discounts, secondary/post-sale discounts and commercial credit notes.
Circular 204/16/2023-GST — 27 October 2023Personal and corporate guarantees; valuation after Rule 28(2).
Circular 210/04/2024-GST — 26 June 2024Import of services from related persons where recipient has full ITC.
Circular 212/06/2024-GST — 26 June 2024Evidence mechanism for Section 15(3)(b)(ii); subsequently withdrawn.
Circular 253/10/2025-GST — 1 October 2025Withdrawal of Circular 212/06/2024-GST.

These are not substitutes for the Act and Rules. They should be used to understand implementation and then checked against the statutory text applicable to the transaction period. citeturn1search40turn2search1turn2search27turn1search38

27. Professional Section 15 valuation workflow

1. Identify supply
Goods, services or both.
2. Test Section 15(1)
Unrelated parties and sole consideration?
3. Determine transaction value
Price actually paid/payable.
4. Add 15(2) amounts
Taxes/charges, supplier liabilities, incidental expenses, delayed-payment additions, subsidies.
5. Test discounts
Section 15(3) and Section 34.
6. Check related/distinct persons
If applicable, move to Rule 28.
7. Check non-monetary consideration
Rule 27.
8. Apply special rules
Rules 29–35 as applicable.
9. Check special notified valuation
Section 15(5).
10. Reconcile
Invoice, books, credit notes, ITC reversal and GST returns.

28. Audit documentation — what should be retained?

DocumentPurpose
Contract / purchase orderEstablishes consideration, charges, discounts and liabilities.
Tax invoiceShows transaction value, discounts and charges.
Debit/credit notesSupports subsequent adjustments.
Discount agreementsCritical for current Section 15(3)(b) conditions.
Recipient ITC reversal evidenceSupports post-sale discount reduction.
Related-party agreementsSupports Rule 28 valuation.
Pure-agent documentationSupports exclusion under Rule 33.
Cost recordsImportant where Rules 30/31 are used.
Rate/valuation notificationsSupports special valuation provisions.
Corporate guarantee documentsRequired to test Rule 28(2).
Audit-ready principle: A reviewer should be able to trace the taxable value from contract → invoice → additions/discounts → valuation rule → GST return without relying on oral explanations.

29. Common mistakes

  • Assuming invoice value is automatically taxable value.
  • Ignoring Section 15(2) additions.
  • Treating every reimbursement as a pure-agent amount.
  • Calling every post-sale adjustment a discount without checking whether it is consideration for another service.
  • Reducing GST through a post-sale credit note without recipient ITC reversal where required.
  • Applying the Finance Act 2026 Section 15(3)(b) amendment before its commencement notification.
  • Using the withdrawn Circular 212/06/2024-GST as the current evidence procedure.
  • Ignoring related-party status before accepting transaction value.
  • Using Rule 28's full-ITC proviso without checking whether a special valuation rule such as Rule 28(2) applies.
  • Ignoring non-monetary consideration.
  • Adding every statutory fee automatically without checking Section 15(2)(a).
  • Treating retention money as an automatic discount.

30. Related provisions

ProvisionConnection
Section 7First establishes whether there is a supply.
Section 9Charging provision.
Sections 12/13Determine time of supply.
Section 14Special time-of-supply rule for rate changes.
Section 16Recipient ITC conditions become important for post-sale discounts.
Section 17ITC restrictions/apportionment can affect the practical impact of valuation adjustments.
Section 25Distinct-person registration framework.
Section 34Credit/debit notes and post-sale value adjustments.
Section 35Accounts and records.
Rules 27–35Detailed prescribed valuation methods.

31. Key takeaways

  • Section 15 determines the taxable value on which GST is calculated.
  • Transaction value is the primary rule when parties are unrelated and price is the sole consideration.
  • Section 15(2) requires specified additions even where transaction value otherwise applies.
  • Discounts require statutory testing; post-sale discounts have additional ITC-reversal requirements.
  • Finance Act 2026 changes Section 15(3)(b), but the amendment is not yet operative as of the current official CBIC text.
  • Related/distinct person transactions require Rule 28 analysis.
  • Corporate guarantees have a special Rule 28(2) valuation mechanism.
  • Pure-agent exclusion is conditional and cannot be claimed merely by describing a payment as reimbursement.
  • Non-monetary consideration requires Rule 27 analysis.
  • Construction businesses should separately analyse contract value, incidental charges, retention, discounts, reimbursements and guarantees.

Disclaimer: This guide is for practical knowledge and working guidance. GST law, rules, notifications, circulars, rates and judicial decisions can change. For historical transactions, apply the law operative on the relevant date. In particular, distinguish enacted-but-not-commenced amendments from provisions currently in force.