GST ACT — SECTION 96

Section 96 CGST Act — Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

Who actually decides a GST advance ruling? Is there a separate Central AAR and State AAR? Which authority handles the application? Section 96 provides the answer.

This detailed guide explains the Authority for Advance Ruling in simple language, how the State/UT GST law connects with the CGST Act, how AAR fits into the overall process, and what businesses should understand before filing an application.

AARAuthority for Advance Ruling.
State / UTThe AAR is constituted under the corresponding State GST or UT GST law.
CGST LinkThe State/UT AAR is deemed to be the AAR for CGST purposes in that State/UT.
Next StageAppeal goes to the Appellate Authority under the advance-ruling framework.

1. Why Section 96 matters

Section 96 answers one basic question: which authority is legally treated as the Authority for Advance Ruling?

The important point is that the CGST Act does not create a completely separate Central Government AAR for every State. Instead, Section 96 uses the Authority constituted under the relevant State GST Act or Union Territory GST Act and treats that authority as the AAR for that State or Union Territory for CGST purposes.

Simple memory rule: For a State/UT, the AAR constituted under its State/UT GST law is also treated as the AAR for CGST purposes in that State/UT.

3. Section 96 in simple language

Imagine a company in Telangana wants an advance ruling about the GST treatment of a proposed service.

The company does not normally approach a completely separate “Central GST AAR” and a “Telangana GST AAR” for the same question. The Authority constituted under the Telangana GST framework is treated as the Authority for Advance Ruling for that State for CGST purposes as well.

State/UT AAR → deemed AAR for that State/UT under the CGST Act

This design reflects the dual GST structure, where Central GST and State/UT GST operate together on the same taxable supply.

4. Exact legal structure

Section 96 is a short provision. Its operative rule is essentially one sentence:

Subject to Chapter XVII, the Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under the State GST Act or UTGST Act is deemed to be the Authority for Advance Ruling for that State or Union Territory for the purposes of the CGST Act.

There is no separate clause-wise machinery in Section 96 itself. The detailed constitution, qualification and appointment of members are dealt with through the relevant State/UT law and the CGST Rules.

5. Is AAR a separate Central GST office?

Not in the way many people initially assume.

Section 96 deliberately connects the CGST advance-ruling authority with the AAR constituted under the State GST or UTGST law.

This means the AAR is part of the coordinated GST architecture rather than a completely independent Central-only forum for each State.

Common misunderstandingCorrect way to understand it
“CGST has one AAR and SGST has another AAR for the same State.”The State/UT AAR is deemed to be the AAR for CGST purposes in that State/UT.
“AAR is just a GST officer's informal opinion.”AAR is a statutory authority under the advance-ruling framework.

6. State GST and CGST connection

The dual-GST structure is the reason Section 96 is important.

For an intra-State transaction, CGST and SGST generally apply together. Instead of creating completely separate advance-ruling authorities for each tax component, Section 96 links the CGST AAR to the authority constituted under the State GST law.

This creates a coordinated forum for the advance-ruling process.

7. Union Territory GST connection

The same principle applies to a Union Territory having its own GST law framework.

Where the Authority is constituted under the relevant Union Territory GST Act, that authority is deemed to be the Authority for Advance Ruling for that Union Territory for CGST purposes.

Practical point: Always identify the State/UT in which the applicant's relevant GST jurisdiction lies before deciding where the advance-ruling application belongs.

8. How is the AAR constituted?

Section 96 establishes which authority is recognised for CGST purposes. The detailed composition comes from the corresponding State/UT GST law and the prescribed rules.

The original GST legislative framework contemplated a two-member AAR with one Central tax member and one State tax member. The practical statutory/rule framework has therefore been designed around participation from both sides of the dual-GST administration.

The GST Council's original design also contemplated an Authority constituted for the State and consisting of one Central tax officer and one State tax officer. citeturn0search3

9. Who are the AAR members?

The detailed current qualification and appointment requirements are contained in the GST Rules.

Rule 103 of the CGST Rules historically provided that the Central Government and State Government appoint officers having at least three years' experience in the rank of Joint Commissioner as members of the AAR. The GST Council has separately considered allowing Deputy Commissioners in States/UTs where the Joint Commissioner post does not exist. citeturn0search2turn0search7

Important: Member qualification is a Rule-level matter and can change independently of the short wording of Section 96. For a live appointment, always verify the current applicable Rule 103 and State/UT appointment order.

10. Rule 103 and member qualification

For a business researching AAR procedure, Section 96 should therefore be read with Rule 103.

QuestionWhere to look
Which authority is the AAR?Section 96.
How is it constituted?Corresponding State/UT GST law and applicable rules.
Member qualification/appointmentRule 103 and relevant appointment provisions.
Application form and feeRule 104 and Form GST ARA-01.
Appeal form and feeRule 106 and Form GST ARA-02.

CBIC's advance-ruling rules prescribe Form GST ARA-01 for the original application and a ₹5,000 fee, while an appeal uses Form GST ARA-02 with a ₹10,000 fee. citeturn0search2

11. Which AAR has jurisdiction?

The first practical question for a taxpayer is not simply “I want an AAR ruling.” It is “which State/UT AAR is relevant to my application?”

Because Section 96 links the CGST AAR to the State/UT AAR, the applicant should identify the relevant State/UT GST registration/jurisdiction and the supply to which the question relates.

If a business has multiple GST registrations, it should not assume that one State's advance ruling automatically becomes its own ruling for every other registration.

Do not confuse territorial presence with automatic pan-India applicability. Advance-ruling binding effect is separately governed by Section 103.

12. Who can approach AAR?

Section 96 identifies the authority; Section 95 defines the applicant; Section 97 provides the application mechanism.

In broad terms, a person who is registered or desirous of obtaining registration may apply, provided the question is one that Section 97(2) permits and the application satisfies the procedural requirements.

Registered applicant
Existing GST registration can support an application.
Person desirous of registration
A person intending to obtain registration can fall within the definition.

13. What questions can AAR decide?

Section 96 does not list the substantive questions. That is the job of Section 97(2).

The permitted categories include:

✓ Classification of goods/services
✓ Applicability of a notification
✓ Time and value of supply
✓ Admissibility of ITC
✓ Liability to pay tax
✓ Whether registration is required
✓ Whether an activity is a supply

Therefore, when preparing an AAR application, the legal question should be mapped directly to the appropriate Section 97(2) clause.

14. AAR process from application to ruling

Step 1 — Identify applicant
Confirm the Section 95 definition.
Step 2 — Identify authority
Section 96 points to the State/UT AAR.
Step 3 — Frame question
Check Section 97(2).
Step 4 — File application
Prescribed form, manner and fee.
Step 5 — Admission
Authority examines maintainability and statutory conditions.
Step 6 — Hearing
Applicant and concerned officer get the statutory opportunity.
Step 7 — Ruling
AAR pronounces its ruling in writing.
Step 8 — Appeal
Section 100 provides the appeal mechanism where available.

15. Does an AAR ruling apply to everyone?

No. This is one of the most important practical points.

Section 103 provides that an advance ruling is binding on the applicant who sought it and on the concerned/jurisdictional officer in respect of that applicant, subject to the statutory conditions.

Therefore, a ruling issued to one company does not automatically become a universally binding GST rule for every other taxpayer.

Example: Company A receives an AAR ruling on classification. Company B cannot simply treat that ruling as though it were a notification or Supreme Court judgment binding on everyone. It may be useful as persuasive material, but the statutory binding effect is governed by Section 103.

16. AAR vs AAAR

PointAARAAAR
RoleOriginal advance rulingAppellate forum
ProvisionSection 96Section 99
Application/appealSection 97Section 100
FormARA-01ARA-02
Typical fee₹5,000₹10,000

The forms and fees are prescribed through the GST Rules. citeturn0search2

17. Construction and infrastructure examples

Works contract

A contractor wants an advance ruling on classification or GST rate for a proposed project. First identify the State/UT AAR under Section 96 and then frame the question under Section 97(2).

HAM project

An infrastructure company has a complex contractual model and wants clarity on valuation or tax liability. The application should identify the exact statutory question rather than request a general opinion on the entire project.

Government project

A contractor working for a government department wants clarity on the applicability of a notification. The notification question can fall within Section 97(2), subject to the other requirements.

Multiple GST registrations

A company operating construction projects in several States should separately consider which registration, State/UT authority and facts are covered by the proposed ruling.

18. Detailed practical cases

Case 1 — Telangana company

A registered company in Telangana seeks a qualifying advance ruling. The Telangana AAR framework is the relevant authority for CGST purposes under Section 96.

Case 2 — Karnataka branch

A separate Karnataka GST registration has different facts. The company should not assume a ruling concerning another State registration automatically covers the Karnataka registration.

Case 3 — Unregistered applicant

A person desirous of obtaining registration may fall within the applicant definition, subject to Section 97 and procedure.

Case 4 — Classification question

A manufacturer asks whether a new product falls under a particular tariff heading. This is a Section 97(2)(a) type question.

Case 5 — Notification question

A contractor asks whether a particular exemption/rate notification applies. This is potentially within Section 97(2)(b).

Case 6 — Valuation question

A complex service arrangement creates uncertainty about value of supply. Section 97(2)(c) should be considered.

Case 7 — ITC question

A business asks whether ITC on a specified inward supply is admissible. This falls within the category in Section 97(2)(d), subject to facts.

Case 8 — Liability question

A taxpayer asks whether it is liable to pay GST on a specified activity. Section 97(2)(e) is relevant.

Case 9 — Registration question

A business wants to determine whether registration is required. Section 97(2)(f) covers this category.

Case 10 — Supply question

A business wants to know whether an activity constitutes a supply. Section 97(2)(g) may apply.

Case 11 — Existing ruling of another taxpayer

A taxpayer finds a similar AAR ruling and wants to rely on it. Section 103 must be considered because the binding effect is applicant-specific.

Case 12 — Appeal

The applicant disagrees with the AAR. The next statutory route is the appeal framework under Section 100, subject to the prescribed conditions and time limits.

19. Important limitations

✗ AAR is not a general tax-advisory forum.
✗ Section 96 does not itself decide taxability.
✗ AAR ruling is not automatically binding on every taxpayer.
✗ Section 97(2) limits the permissible questions.
✗ State/UT jurisdiction matters.
✗ Multiple GST registrations require careful fact mapping.
✗ AAR does not replace appellate/court remedies outside its statutory framework.
✗ AAR procedure and member qualifications should be checked under current Rules.

20. Professional preparation workflow

1. Identify GSTIN
Map the relevant registration and State/UT.
2. Identify AAR
Apply Section 96.
3. Identify issue
Write the exact commercial question.
4. Map Section 97(2)
Identify the statutory clause.
5. Build facts
Contract, invoices, flowchart and transaction structure.
6. Research law
Act, Rules, notifications and relevant rulings.
7. Prepare application
Use prescribed form and fee.
8. Prepare hearing
Keep submissions tied to the question asked.
9. Review ruling
Check reasoning and exact scope.
10. Decide appeal
Use Section 100 where appropriate.

21. Documents checklist

✓ GST registration certificate
✓ PAN/entity documents
✓ State/UT details
✓ Contracts
✓ Work orders
✓ Product/service description
✓ Process flow
✓ Sample invoices
✓ Relevant notifications
✓ Valuation workings
✓ ITC analysis
✓ Existing AAR/AAAR rulings
✓ Department correspondence
✓ Precise questions for ruling

22. Common mistakes

  • Thinking there is a separate Central-only AAR for every State.
  • Ignoring the State/UT jurisdiction.
  • Asking a question outside Section 97(2).
  • Confusing AAR with AAAR.
  • Assuming another taxpayer's ruling automatically binds the applicant.
  • Submitting incomplete facts.
  • Failing to distinguish an existing supply from a proposed supply.
  • Ignoring the relevant GST registration when the company has multiple registrations.
  • Relying on old AAR procedural information without checking current Rules.
  • Treating an AAR ruling like a notification applicable to the whole industry.

23. Legislative and Council development

GST Council design stage: The original GST framework contemplated a State-level Authority with one Central tax and one State tax member. citeturn0search3
1 July 2017: Section 96 came into force as part of the advance-ruling framework. citeturn0search0turn0search6
Rules: Rule 103 provides the detailed member-qualification framework, while the advance-ruling rules prescribe forms and fees. citeturn0search2
Current practical structure: GST Council maintains AAR/AAAR information and current ruling records, demonstrating that State/UT advance-ruling authorities continue to operate under the framework. citeturn0search4turn0search5

24. Current practical position

Section 96 remains a short but important coordination provision. Current statutory text continues to provide that the State/UT AAR is deemed to be the AAR for that State/UT for CGST purposes. citeturn0search6

Advance-ruling authorities continue to issue rulings in 2026. The GST Council's current advance-ruling database records recent 2026 AAR orders involving classification, notifications, rates and taxability questions. citeturn0search5

Practical conclusion: When a business wants an advance ruling, first identify the relevant State/UT AAR, then frame the question under Section 97(2), and only then prepare the application under the prescribed Rules.

25. Section 96 GST FAQs

What is Section 96 of the CGST Act?

Section 96 identifies the Authority for Advance Ruling for CGST purposes in each State or Union Territory.

What is AAR in GST?

AAR means Authority for Advance Ruling.

Is AAR a Central or State authority?

Section 96 links the CGST AAR to the Authority constituted under the relevant State GST or UTGST law.

Which authority gives advance ruling for CGST?

The AAR constituted under the relevant State or UT GST law is deemed to be the AAR for CGST purposes in that State or UT.

Can AAR decide CGST and SGST issues?

The statutory framework is designed around the dual GST system, and the State/UT AAR is deemed to be the CGST AAR for that State/UT. The precise scope of a ruling depends on the Act and facts.

Who are the AAR members?

The detailed qualification and appointment framework is provided through the GST Rules and the corresponding State/UT provisions.

How much does a GST advance-ruling application cost?

Under the prescribed CGST Rules, Form ARA-01 carries a fee of ₹5,000. Always verify the current Rules before filing.

What is the difference between AAR and AAAR?

AAR gives the original advance ruling; AAAR is the appellate authority under the Chapter XVII framework.

Does an AAR ruling apply to all taxpayers?

No. Section 103 generally makes the ruling binding on the applicant and the concerned/jurisdictional officer in respect of that applicant.

Can a company with multiple GST registrations use one AAR ruling everywhere?

Do not assume so. The binding effect and facts must be analysed with reference to the applicant and relevant jurisdiction.

Can an unregistered person approach AAR?

A person desirous of obtaining registration is included in the definition of applicant under Section 95, subject to the other statutory requirements.

What questions can be asked to AAR?

Section 97(2) specifies the permitted categories, including classification, notifications, time/value of supply, ITC, liability, registration and whether an activity constitutes a supply.

Is Section 96 itself an application provision?

No. Section 96 identifies the authority. Section 97 deals with the application and permissible questions.

27. Key takeaways

  • Section 96 tells you who the GST Authority for Advance Ruling is.
  • The State/UT AAR is deemed to be the AAR for CGST purposes in that State/UT.
  • There is not a separate Central-only AAR for each State for the same CGST advance-ruling framework.
  • The detailed composition and member qualifications are found in the Rules and corresponding State/UT framework.
  • Rule 103 is important when researching AAR member qualifications.
  • Section 97 determines what questions can actually be taken to AAR.
  • Section 103 determines the binding effect; an AAR ruling is not automatically a nationwide rule.
  • Businesses with multiple GST registrations should carefully map the relevant State/UT and applicant before filing.
  • A good advance-ruling application begins with a precise Section 97(2) question and complete facts.

Disclaimer: This guide is for practical educational use. Advance-ruling procedure, member appointments and forms can change through amendments and notifications. Verify the current CGST Rules and the relevant State/UT GST framework before filing.